PERAN PANITERA PENGGANTI DALAM PELAKSANAAN ASAS PERADILAN YANG CEPAT, SEDERHANA BIAYA RINGAN

Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Padang Kelas IA

Authors

  • Arni Yetti Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti, Padang Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v4i1.172

Keywords:

PANITERA, PERADILAN, BIAYA RINGAN

Abstract

The role of the substitute clerk in the implementation of the judicial principle that is fast, simple and inexpensive, as referred to in Article 45 of the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2015 concerning the Organization and Work Procedure of the Registrar and Secretariat of the Court. The role of the criminal justice bureaucracy in the courts is very important to realize substantial justice because the Criminal Procedure Code adheres to a service model in the administration of criminal justice. The Substitute Registrar in the implementation of fast, simple, low-cost judicial principles at the Padang Class IA District Court is very decisive in the trial process to produce a quality decision to fulfill a sense of justice for the parties involved. The principle of a simple, fast and low-cost judicial system is one of the principles in the justice system in Indonesia as regulated in Article 4 Paragraph (2) of Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Authority which reads "The court helps justice seekers and tries to overcome all obstacles and obstacles to achieve justice. simple, fast, and low-cost justice can be achieved". The role of the substitute clerk in the implementation of fast, simple, low-cost judicial principles at the Padang Class IA District Court is in charge of preparing the trial before the trial, during the trial and or the trial is in progress and after the trial and post-trial, such as assisting the judge in the trial, recording the course of the trial. then put it in the minutes of the trial. The obstacles encountered by the substitute clerk in the implementation of the principle of justice are fast, simple, low cost at the Padang Class IA District Court, both internally and externally. Internal factors, namely: a) The large number of incoming cases, making it difficult to determine the day of the trial; b) The existence of one of the Panel of Judges who handles criminal cases who are sick, on leave or are carrying out other tasks outside the city, thus causing disruption of the trial agenda that has been previously determined. External factors, namely: a) The presence of witnesses who are not on time from the trial agenda that has been set; b) The condition of the defendant who is sick, which is confirmed by a doctor's statement; c) The Public Prosecutor cannot present witnesses for several trials; e) The defendant or victim is unable to present a witness, because the witness is domiciled outside the city of Padang.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku-Buku

Ismanyah, Penyelidikan, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana di Bidang Perbankan, PT. RadjaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2015.

Lawrence M. Friedman, American Law: An Introduction (Penterjemah Wishnu Basuki) PT. Tata Nusa, Jakarta, 2001.

Suryono Sutarto, Hukum Acara Pidana, BP UNDIP Semarang, 2011.

Sudikno Mertokusomo, Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar), Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1999.

Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Cetakan 3, Jakarta, 1998.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Undang-undang Nomor 49 Tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Umun

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 92 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1983 tentang Pelaksanaan Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2015 Tentang Organisasi dan Tata Keria Kepaniteraan dan Kesekretariatan Peradilan

Surat Keputusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 122/KMA/SK/VII Tahun 2013 tentang Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilalku Panitera dan Junsita

Surat Keputusan Direkeur Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum Nomor: 353DJU/SK/HM02.3 Tahun 2015 tentang Prosedur Penggunaan dan Supervisi Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara di Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama dan Pengadilan Tingkat Banding Pada Lingkungan Peradilan Umum

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Yetti, A. (2020). PERAN PANITERA PENGGANTI DALAM PELAKSANAAN ASAS PERADILAN YANG CEPAT, SEDERHANA BIAYA RINGAN: Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Padang Kelas IA. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 4(1), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v4i1.172

Similar Articles

1-10 of 58

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.