Analsis Yuridis Batas Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Sengketa Akta Autentik Pada Perkara Perdata
Downloads
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis batas pertanggungjawaban notaris dalam sengketa akta autentik pada perkara perdata serta mengkaji batasan normatif tanggung jawab notaris berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan dan doktrin hukum perdata. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Bahan hukum primer berupa Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, serta putusan pengadilan terkait sengketa akta autentik, sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder diperoleh dari literatur dan jurnal ilmiah yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban notaris dalam sengketa perdata bersifat terbatas pada aspek formal pembuatan akta, yaitu kebenaran formil atas identitas para pihak, waktu, dan prosedur pembuatan akta, bukan pada kebenaran materiil isi pernyataan para pihak. Notaris dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban apabila terbukti melakukan pelanggaran terhadap kewajiban jabatan, asas kehati-hatian, atau terdapat unsur kesalahan dan kelalaian yang menimbulkan kerugian. Dengan demikian, batas pertanggungjawaban notaris berfungsi sebagai perlindungan hukum sekaligus sebagai instrumen penegakan profesionalitas jabatan notaris dalam praktik perdata.
Aditya, K. L. S., Valerieo Ezra Hutagalung, Julienna Hartono, & Indah Permatasari Kosuma. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Tanda Terima Atas Penyerahan Sertipikat Hak Milik. Media Iuris, 5(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v5i2.32261
Afwija, Z. M., Oktafia, Y., & Ghofar, A. (2025). STRENGTHENING ACCOUNTABILITY IN INDONESIAN NOTARIAL PRACTICE: THE LEGAL GAP ON LIABILITY FOR BACKDATED DEEDS. Indonesia Private Law Review, 6(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v6i1.4459
Al-Zawahreh, M. M., & Abdaljwad, S. A. (2026). Civil Liability Provisions of the Notary Public in Electronic Transactions: A Comparative Study. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Vol. 594, pp. 2663–2676). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89771-9_190
ALVES, F. G., & De ALMEIDA NETO, L. M. (2020). The civil liability of scriveners, notaries or registry officers. Civilistica.com, 9(1). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85109800115&partnerID=40&md5=d388b4ad09dc8f0f08caef285ab98872
Bae, H. (2022). Medical Liability in South Korea. In Ius Gentium (Vol. 94, pp. 267–282). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4855-7_16
Butler, O. (2025). Algorithmic Decision-Making, Delegation and the Modern Machinery of Government. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(3), 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf018
Cahyaning Putri, R. P., & Masriani, Y. T. (2025). Between Notarial Formality and Digital Innovation: A Legal Inquiry into Bilingual Electronic Agreements. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 06(04), 1673–1684. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2025.v6i04.06290
Caumes, G. (2012). The civil and criminal liability of the nurse | La responsabilité civile et pénale de I’infirmier. Revue de l’Infirmiere, 182, 26–27. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84863915109&partnerID=40&md5=a7fc3f752d9e878659ed29ab35392d2b
Fendri, A., & Mannas, Y. A. (2019). Electronic notary deed: A legal certainty study based on the law of notarial, the law of the limited liability company and the law of electronic transaction and information. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(5), 109–119. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079621200&partnerID=40&md5=391615e89d99c8f0550dcfbc32b76a52
Heiner, T., & Barzó, T. (2014). Topical issues of medical malpractices. Orvosi Hetilap, 155(38), 1510–1516. https://doi.org/10.1556/OH.2014.29970
Iriantoro, A. (2025). Notarial Authority and Legal Accountability in Sharia Banking Contracts: A Doctrinal Study. Jurnal Hukum, 41(3), 528. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i3.42041
Isnaini, H., & Utomo, W. (2019). The existence of the notary and notarial deeds within private procedural law in the industrial revolution era 4.0. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(3), 128–139. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079637568&partnerID=40&md5=8a3c20f74d22a577a2c55286ba63a8b5
Jamil, M. (2019). Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Sebagai Aspek Pidana Notaris. BESTUUR, 7(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v7i2.40453
Kane, J., & Patapan, H. (2006). In Search of Prudence: The Hidden Problem of Managerial Reform. Public Administration Review, 66(5), 711–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00636.x
Keumala, D. (2023). The Dialectic of Notary Inheritance Deed Arrangement. Yuridika, 38(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37787
Mahadewi, I. G. A. I. L., Padmawati, N. K. T., & Rwa Jayantiar, I. G. A. M. (2022). Notary in Indonesia: How Are State Fundamental Values Reflected in Law and Professional Ethics? Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, 6(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.24843/UJLC.2022.v06.i02.p05
Man, H. (2013). Medical Malpractice Liability. In Legal and Forensic Medicine (pp. 605–619). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_108
Man, H. (2022). Medical Malpractice Liability in China (Mainland). In Ius Gentium (Vol. 94, pp. 13–26). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4855-7_2
Mattace, G. (2023). the Notary’S Professional Liability Beyond the Boundaries of the Contract. Actualidad Juridica Iberoamericana, 18, 1810–1829. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85159167448&partnerID=40&md5=53ffa766b197ed2171b011d4705132b9
Moore, M. S. (2009). Causation and Responsibility. In Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256860.001.0001
Olejarski, A. M., & Neal, S. M. (2023). Empowering Public Administrators. In Empowering Public Administrators: Ethics and Public Service Values. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032651835
Peno, M. (2019). The Character of the Principles of Criminal Law and Criminal Responsibility: Between the Philosophy of Law and Semiotic. Liverpool Law Review, 40(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-019-09226-y
Sager, F., Thomann, E., & Hupe, P. (2021). Accountability of Public Servants at the Street Level. In The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant (pp. 801–818). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_5
Siswanto, C. A., Adiyatma, S. E., Nnawulezi, U., & Kabano, J. (2026). LEGAL RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC NOTARIAL ACTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND RWANDA. Indonesia Private Law Review, 6(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v6i2.4686
Suryadi, S., & Rahayu, T. (2023). Legal Interpretation of Terms, Phrases, and Clauses in the Notarial Deeds. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 14(2), 304. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v14i2.a25751
Suryahartati, D., Windarto, & Lestari. (2025). Tradisi Hukum dan Inovasi Digital: Menakar Posisi Produk E- Notary pada Sengketa Perdata. LITIGASI, 26(1), 409–447. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v26i1.19193
Tremml, T. (2006). Torts. In Key Aspects of German Business Law (pp. 97–109). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28492-3_9
Wijaya, V. T., & Hapsari, A. N. (2023). TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP EKSEKUSI JAMINAN PESAWAT UDARA DALAM INTERNATIONAL INTEREST PADA KONVENSI CAPE TOWN 2001. Mimbar Hukum, 35(Special Issue), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v35i0.11395
Copyright (c) 2026 Muh. Fachrul Rochman, Sudirman, Wahyudi Umar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (UJSJ) berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (UJSJ).
